Fiaseu
Fiaseu v. United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PASE FIASEU and RODOLFO Case No.: 3:22-cv-00752-GPC-BLM
MARTINEZ,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
Plaintiffs, DISMISS SECOND AMENDED v. COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
[ECF No. 17] Defendant. 15 16 Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Pase Fiaseu’s and Rodolfo Martinez’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC” or “Complaint”), filed by Defendant United States of America. ECF No. 17. Mr. Fiaseu and Mr. Martinez have filed their response in opposition to the motion to dismiss, ECF No. 22, and the United States has replied, ECF No. 24. The Court finds that the matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument and pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d) hereby VACATES the motion hearing previously scheduled for Friday, April 21, 2023. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend. / / / 27 …