Jayashankar

Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20233:21-cv-02137California3,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMERA LABS INC., Case No. 21-cv-2137-MMA (DDL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

RAJ JAYASHANKAR, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 52] 16 17 18 Plaintiff Kimera Labs Inc. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Defendants Raj Jayashankar, Exocel Bio Inc., Alejandro Contreras, and Deb Hubers (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging misappropriation of Plaintiff’s trade secrets and unjust enrichment. See Doc. No. 51. On November 23, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Doc. No. 52. Plaintiff opposed the motion, Doc. No. 55, and Defendants replied, Doc. No. 56. The Court found the matters suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.