Rutledge
Rutledge v. ADP, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 22CV898-L(BLM) NATHANAEL RUTLEDGE,
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO
STAY DISCOVERY PENDING
v. RESOLUTION OF SPECIAL MOTION TO
STRIKE/MOTION TO DISMISS
ADP, INC.,
Defendants. [ECF No. 31]
16 Currently before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Special Motion to Strike/Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 31. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This matter was initiated on June 19, 2022 when Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging claims for disability discrimination, disability harassment, unlawful psychological examination, failure to prevent discrimination/harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, failure to produce employment records, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on November 21, 2022 alleging the same causes of action. ECF No. 17. …