Aliff

Aliff v. Vervent, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20233:20-cv-00697California2,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HEATHER TURREY, et al., Case No.: 20-CV-0697 DMS (AHG)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER (1) DENYING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2)

VERVENT, INC., et al.,

DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

Defendants. TO STRIKE; AND (3) GRANTING

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE A

SURREPLY

17 This case comes before the Court on Defendants’ renewed Motion for Summary 18 Judgment (ECF No. 158), and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Reply to Response to Motion, 19 or in the alternative, to file a Surreply brief (ECF No. 178). The matter is fully briefed and 20 submitted. 21 Defendants bring a second summary judgment motion again challenging Plaintiffs’ 22 claims under (1) the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”); (2) 23 the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”); (3) California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt 24 Collection Practice Act (“Rosenthal Act”); (4) California’s Unfair Competition Law 25 (“UCL”); and (5) common law negligent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.