Nelson v. Sorrento Tower Apartments

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WARREN F. NELSON, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01554-RBM-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR WAIVER OF PACER

FEES AND SUPPORTING

SORRENTO TOWER APARTMENTS,

AFFIDAVIT

et al., 15 Defendants. 16 [Docs. 47, 48] 17 On December 4, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Waiver of Pacer Fees (Doc. 47) and a supporting affidavit (Doc. 48). Plaintiff states that he has a balance of $73.80 in PACER fees and requests the Court waive the current balance of PACER fees as well as all future PACER fees. (Doc. 47 at 1–2.) The PACER System acts as a portal to information stored on the Court’s Case Management/Electronic Case Files (“CM/ECF”) system. Through CM/ECF, all parties and attorneys of record receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically. In light of this procedure, Plaintiff has not justified the waiver of PACER fees. See Katumbusi v. Gary, No. 2:14-CV-1534 JAM AC,

27 1 CM/ECF is the Court’s case…