Morgan
Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL MORGAN and MICHAEL Case No.: 20-cv-574-GPC-AHG BEVAN, individually and on behalf of 12 others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE MOTION TO FILE Plaintiffs,
EXCESS PAGES
14 v. [ECF No. 156] ROHR, INC., et al., 16 Defendants.
18 Before the Court is Defendants’ Ex Parte Motion for an Order Extending the Page 19 Limit on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify Class. ECF No. 156. Plaintiffs filed an 20 Opposition. ECF No. 158. 21 Local Rule 7.1(h) provides a 25-page page limit for briefs or memoranda. 22 Defendants request that this Court grant leave allowing Defendants’ Motion to Decertify 23 Class to be filed at 35 pages. ECF No. 156 at 3. Defendants’ Motion is due May 4, 2023. 24 Id. Defendants state this page enlargement is necessary because “[t]he motion involves 25 decertifying six separate subclasses, each with distinct theories of liability.” Id. They 26 27 argue that the evidence and issues “are so extensive that they…