Arellano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, Case No.: 22cv441-TWR(LR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND

A. CALDERON, et al.,

REPLY MOTION

Defendants. [ECF No. 26] 16 17 Presently before the Court are pro se Plaintiff Raul Arellano’s: (1) Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s previous order overruling his objections to his deposition being taken remotely,1 and (2) Reply Motion supporting his renewed request to depose Defendants and amend the Scheduling Order in this case. (Pl.’s Reply Motion, ECF No. 26 (“Reply Motion”).) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration and Reply Motion in their entirety. 25 26 1 The Court’s Order overruling Plaintiff’s objections to his deposition being taken remotely was filed on March 27, 2023. (See ECF No. 25.) 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, currently incarcerated…