Pena
Pena v. GameStop, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICENTE PENA, individually and on Case No.: 22-CV-1635 JLS (MDD) behalf of others similarly situated,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS v. 14 (ECF No. 8)
GAMESTOP, INC.,
15 Defendant.
17 Presently before the Court is Defendant GameStop, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “GameStop”) Motion to Stay, Dismiss, or Transfer or in the Alternative Dismiss (“Mot.,” ECF No. 8). Plaintiff Vicente Pena filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 11), and Defendant filed a Reply in support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 12), as well as three Notices of Supplemental Authority, see ECF No. 13 (“1st Supp.”); ECF No. 16 (“2d Supp.”); ECF No. 18 (“3d Supp.”). Having carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1), the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE. / / / / / / …