Kelly

Kelly v. Arlington

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20233:23-cv-00695California1,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOLORES KELLY, Case No.: 23-CV-695 JLS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

MICHEAL ARLINGTON and (2) DISMISSING ACTION

CRUNCHBASE,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR Defendants. FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEES 16 REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT

OF COUNSEL

(ECF Nos. 2, 3) 21 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Dolores Kelly’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2) and Request for Appointment of Counsel (“Counsel Mot.,” ECF No. 3). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and the applicable law the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s IFP Motion, DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Counsel Motion, and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint, for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.