J.A.M.

J.A.M. v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20233:22-cv-00380California3,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.A.M, a minor child, et al., Case No.: 22-cv-380-GPC-BGS

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

COMPEL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

Defendants. [ECF 32] 16 Plaintiffs have filed a Motion to Compel Production of Responsive Documents to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production Nos. 26 and 27. (ECF 32.) Plaintiffs seek production of the illustrations/diagrams of the Admissibility Enforcement Unit (“AEU”) referenced in Defendant’s privilege log and still images responsive to RFPs 26 and 27—the cells and interview room where the minor Plaintiffs were questioned and held. (Id.) Defendant has filed an Opposition arguing the information Plaintiffs seek is irrelevant, disproportionate, and should be withheld based on the law enforcement privilege. (ECF 33.1) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Compel.

26 1 The Court notes that when raising this dispute,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.