Schweinsburg
Schweinsburg v. General Mills, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORETTA SCHWEINSBURG, on behalf Case No.: 3:22-cv-00403-RBM-DDL of herself and all others similarly situated,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO AMEND
Plaintiff, JUDGMENT v. 14 [Doc. 27]
GENERAL MILLS, INC.; GENERAL
MILLS SALES, INC.,
16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 Currently pending before the Court is a motion to alter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 59, filed by Plaintiff Loretta Schweinsburg (“Plaintiff”). (Doc. 27.) Defendants General Mills, Inc. and General Mills Sales, Inc. (“Defendants” or “General Mills”) filed a brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 28), and Plaintiff filed a reply (Doc. 29). The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND As detailed in the Court’s November 7, 2022 Order (see Doc. 25),…