Bar-Lev

Bar-Lev v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20233:23-cv-00139California1,188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23-cv-139-DMS-AHG

NAOMI BAR-LEV, ORDER (1) GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO Plaintiff,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

14 v. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE

16 Defendants. GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); AND (3) DENYING

AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO APPOINT COUNSEL.

19 Plaintiff Naomi Bar-Lev submitted a Complaint (ECF No. 1) along with a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), (ECF No. 2), and a motion to appoint counsel. (ECF No. 9.) For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP is granted, Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed, and Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel is denied as moot. A. Motion to Proceed IFP Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP indicates her only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.