Mosley
Mosley v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ALEXANDRIA MOSLEY, REJOYCE Case No.: 22-cv-01976-DMS-AGS
KEMP, BERENICE CISNEROS, BRUCE
11 PARKER, individually, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL Plaintiffs,
ARBITRATION, AND DENYING AS
13 v. MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WELLS FARGO & CO., WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A., and DOES 1 through 5, 16 Defendants. 17 18 This case comes before the Court on competing motions: Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, (ECF No. 13), and Defendants’ (collectively “Wells Fargo”) motion to compel arbitration. (ECF No. 21.) These matters are fully briefed and submitted. For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration, denies as moot Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, and dismisses this case without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND AND FACTS …