Morneau

Morneau v. Protective Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20233:22-cv-01861California2,966 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CRISTIN MORNEAU, individually; Case No.: 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG KELLY STRANGE, individually; AND ORDER: Cristin Morneau and Kelly Strange,

jointly as successors-in-interest to (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO Carolyn A. Morneau and on behalf of the EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES,

ESTATE OF CAROLYN A. MORNEAU,

and 16 Plaintiffs, (2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY, [ECF No. 26] Defendant. 21 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF No. 26. The parties seek an order from the Court extending certain discovery deadlines by approximately 60 days. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.