Arellano

Arellano v. Guldseth

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20233:20-cv-01633California9,524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1633-RBM-DDL

CDCR #AH-1995,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SUMMARY vs. JUDGMENT PURSUANT 14 TO Fed. R. Civ. P.

DR. GULDSETH;

DR. S. ROBERTS,

[Doc. 49] 16 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff Raul Arellano (“Plaintiff” or “Arellano”), currently incarcerated at 19 Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, and 20 proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 21 18, 2018. See Compl., Doc. 1.1 Arellano claims Dr. Guldseth, a doctor at RJD, violated 22 his First and Eighth Amendment rights, and violated the Bane Act, by refusing to 23 prescribe increased doses of Gabapentin—a medication he contends was previously 24 25 1 Throughout this Order and for ease of consistency and reference, the Court will cite to each document in the record using both the number assigned to the document and the page number automatically generated by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.