Myles

Myles v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20233:15-cv-01985California2,821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICKAIL MYLES, an individual, Case No. 15-cv-01985-JAH-BLM

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL AND

v. DENYING MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, by and LAW [Doc. Nos. 447, 448] through the SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a public entity; and DEPUTY J. BANKS, an individual,

Defendants.

Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motion for a new trial and Defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff filed oppositions to the motions and Defendants filed replies. After a thorough review of the parties’ submissions and for the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motions. I. Legal Standards Pursuant to Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may renew a motion for judgment as a matter of law and “may include an alternative or joint request for a new trial under Rule 59.” FED.R.CIV.P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.