Farias
Farias v. Carlyle Investment Management, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 HUMBERTO FARIAS, Case No.: 22-cv-1790-DMS-DDL 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
vs. DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
CARLYLE INVESTMENT JURISDICTION
MANAGEMENT, LLC, CPI/GV CRESTVIEW ESTATES OWNER,
LLC, AND CPI/GV CRESTVIEW
TRS, LLC,
Defendants.
18 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s 19 Complaint for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction (ECF 20 No. 4). Plaintiff filed an opposition (ECF No. 5), Defendant filed a reply (ECF No. 21 6), and Plaintiff filed a surreply (ECF No. 8)1. For the following reasons, 22 Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.
24 1 Plaintiff did not seek leave of Court to file a surreply, and Defendants did not have an opportunity to respond to Plaintiff’s surreply. See U.S. ex rel. Meyer v. Horizon Health Corp., 565 F.3d 1195, 1203 (9th Cir. 2009) (stating…