Kramer

Kramer v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20233:20-cv-02065California2,986 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

23 In March 2018, Plaintiff Deborah K. filed an application for Social Security 24 Disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, alleging a disability date of 25 26 27 May 10, 2017. ECF No. 18 at 2.1 Her application was initially denied. Id. Deborah K. obtained a legal representative, ECF No. 9- at 7, then filed an application for Supplemental Security Income benefits, ECF No. 18 at 2. Both claims were denied at reconsideration. Id. Subsequently, Deborah K. filed a request for a hearing by an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) and a hearing was held in October 2019. Id. In November 2019, the ALJ issued an unfavorable decision, finding that Deborah K. was not disabled under the Act. Id. Deborah K. requested review of the ALJ’s decision with the Appeals Council; her request was denied. Id. In October 2020, Deborah K. entered into a new retainer agreement with the Law Offices of Charles E. Binder and Harry J. Binder, LLP (“Counsel”). ECF No. 27-4; see ECF No. 9-2 (appointment of representative form). The agreement addressed contingency fees and provided that Counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.