Camran

Camran v. San Diego Youth Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20233:23-cv-00491California2,699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SARA CAMRAN, Case No.: 23-cv-491-GPC-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES,

PAUPERIS;

Defendant. [ECF No. 2] (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL [ECF No. 3]

20 Plaintiff Sara Camran, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendant San 21 Diego Youth Services. ECF No. 1. She also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis 22 (“IFP”), ECF No. 2, and a request for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3. Based on the 23 reasoning below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis; 24 DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, and sua sponte DISMISSES the 25 action for failure to state a claim. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to amend her 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.