Camran
Camran v. San Diego Youth Services
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20233:23-cv-00491California2,699 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SARA CAMRAN, Case No.: 23-cv-491-GPC-WVG
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES,
PAUPERIS;
Defendant. [ECF No. 2] (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL [ECF No. 3]
20 Plaintiff Sara Camran, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendant San 21 Diego Youth Services. ECF No. 1. She also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis 22 (“IFP”), ECF No. 2, and a request for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3. Based on the 23 reasoning below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis; 24 DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, and sua sponte DISMISSES the 25 action for failure to state a claim. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to amend her 26…