Russo

Russo v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20233:18-cv-01837-TWR-MDDCalifornia337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONINO RUSSO, Case No.: 18-CV-1837 TWR (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED

MOTION, AND (2) DIRECTING THE

CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; LISA JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF RAMIREZ; HUGH DAVIDSON; and IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,227.25

DOES 2–10,

(ECF Nos. 184, 188) Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Defendants County of San Diego, Lisa Ramirez, and Hugh Davidson’s Motion for Order Directing the Clerk to Add Sanctions Amount to Judgment; or Otherwise Alter or Amend Judgment to Include Sanctions Previously Ordered (“Mot.,” ECF No. 188), as well as Plaintiff Tonino Russo’s Notice of Non- Opposition re: Motion for Order Directing the Clerk to Add Sanctions Amount to Judgment. (See ECF No. 192.) As Defendants note, (see Mot. at 2), “[u]nder state law, a sanctions order is enforceable in the same way…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.