Doe

Doe v. Neighborhood Healthcare

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20233:21-cv-01587California1,677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

20 Plaintiff Jane Doe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“Plaintiff”), brings this action for violation of federal and state law related to an alleged data breach against Defendants Netgain Technology, LLC (“Netgain”) and the United States of America (“United States”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Before the Court is: (1) Plaintiff and the United States’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the United States, ECF No. 27; (2) the United States’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 23; and (3) Plaintiff’s request to remand to 27 California statutory law specifically allows a party to bring a lawsuit using a 28 state court the remaining state law claims. The United States’ Motion to Dismiss was submitted on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and Rule 78(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 25. After considering the papers submitted, supporting documentation, and applicable law, the Court: (1) GRANTS the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the United States without prejudice; (2) DENIES as moot the United States’ Motion to …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.