Martin

Martin v. Nordic Naturals, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20233:23-cv-00441California136 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} RUTH MARTIN, Case No.: 23cv0441-L-WVG Plants, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 |] Vv. DISMISS AS MOOT 14 |} NORDIC NATURALS, INC., [ECF No. 3] Defendant. 16 Pending before the court is a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (ECF 18 || No. 3.) Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint (ECF no. 4). See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 19 || 15(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, motion to dismiss is denied as moot. See Ramirez v. County 20 || of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 || Dated: May 9, 2023 fee oop H . James Lorenz, United States District Judge 26 27 28