Sandoval
Sandoval v. City of National City
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NOHELY SANDOVAL, on behalf of Case No.: 22CV1657-GPC(AGS) B.U. who sues individually and as 12 successor in interest to Brian Umana, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND ROBERTO UMANA, and MARGARITA DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
CARDENAS, MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH
Plaintiffs, LEAVE TO AMEND v. 16 [DKT. NO. 25.]
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY;
NATIONAL CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT; and DOES 1-20, Defendant. 20 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 25.) Plaintiffs responded and Defendants replied. (Dkt. Nos. 29, 34.) The Court finds that the matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss with leave to amend. 27…