Weinberg

Weinberg v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20233:23-cv-00454California888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW WEINBERG, individually and Case No.: 23cv454-LL-BLM on behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND v. 14 [ECF No. 10]

WALMART INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND On March 10, 2023, Defendant Walmart Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a Notice of Removal of this action from San Diego County Superior Court. ECF No. 1. Defendant’s Notice of Removal asserted jurisdiction was proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because: “(1) Plaintiff Andrew Weinberg’s (“Plaintiff”) proposed putative class includes more than 100 members; (2) diversity of citizenship exists; and (3) the amount placed in controversy by Plaintiff’s claims exceeds $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs.” Id. at 2. On March 30, 2023, Plaintiff Andrew Weinberg (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to Remand (“Motion”). ECF No. 10. In his Motion, Plaintiff argues that there is no federal equitable jurisdiction and that he lacks standing over…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.