Stroud

Stroud v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20233:18-cv-00515-JLS-MDDCalifornia762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLARD RICHARD STROUD, JR., Case No.: 18-CV-515-JLS (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER APPROVING

v. APPLICATION FOR

REIMBURSEMENT OF

SHERIFF WILLIAM D. GORE, et al.,

EXPENSES PURSUANT TO

Defendants. CIVIL LOCAL RULE 83.8(a)(2)

15 (ECF No. 139) 16

Presently before the Court is the Application for Reimbursement of Expenses Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.8(a)(2) of Plaintiff Willard Richard Stroud, Jr.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Stroud”) Court-appointed pro bono counsel, Joseph Barbarie (“Appl.,” ECF No. 139). On October 13, 2022, this Court appointed Mr. Barbarie, a member of this District’s Pro Bono Panel, to represent Plaintiff. See ECF No. 119; Declaration of Joseph Barbarie (“Barbarie Decl.,” ECF No. 139-1) ¶ 2. Thereafter, Mr. Barbarie prepared a trial brief, pretrial disclosures, and a joint proposed pretrial order; attended and participated in the January 12, 2023 Final Pretrial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.