Ethridge

Ethridge v. Perales

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20233:23-cv-00763California3,850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CARL ETHRIDGE, Case No.: 23-CV-763-GPC-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. 1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S H. PERALES, parole supervisor; SEAN

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

MASTERSON, parole agent; and Dr. PAUPERIS; KINGSTON, HOPE program supervisor,

15 Defendants. 2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM AND FOR

SEEKING MONETARY DAMAGES

AGAINST DEFENDANTS WHO ARE

IMMUNE;

3) DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

AND

22 4) DENYING MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

25 [Dkt. Nos. 2, 3, 4.] 26 On April 26, 2023, Plaintiff Carl Ethridge (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendants H. Perale, parole supervisor; Sean Masterson, parole agent and Dr. Kingston, Hope Program Supervisor. (Dkt. No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.