Brant
Williams v. Brant
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY LEE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 23-cv-241 TWR (DDL) Inmate #21114692,
ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS; (2) DISMISSING
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
LT. BRANT #2880 et al., U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND § 1915A(b); Defendants. AND (3) DENYING MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL
17 (ECF Nos. 2, 3)
19 Tommy Lee Williams (“Plaintiff” or “Williams”), currently incarcerated at San Diego Central Jail (“SDCJ”), is proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF No. 1, “Compl.”) He has also filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. (ECF Nos. 2–3.) I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of / / / / / / $402. See 28 U.S.C. §…