Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20233:18-cv-00361California2,539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. RECUSAL MOTION; (2) GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S EXTENSION

REQUEST; (3) GRANTING

D. PARAMO, et al., DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO Defendants. CONTINUE; AND (4) SETTING

REVISED PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

17 (ECF Nos. 273, 277, 279 & 283) 18 19 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed’s (“Plaintiff” or “Reed”) “Judicial Notice/Status/Recusal Request” (“Recusal Mot.,” ECF No. 277), which the Court construes as a renewed motion to recuse, and “Judicial Notice (Status)” (“Ext. Req.,” ECF No. 279), which the Court construes as a request for an extension of the present pretrial deadlines. Also before the Court is Defendant E. Zendejas’s Ex Parte Application to Reschedule the August 10, 2023 Pretrial Conference (“Mot. to Continue,” ECF No. 283). Having considered the Parties’ filings and the law, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.