Cullen

Cullen v. Ryvyl Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20233:23-cv-00185California1,668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK CULLEN, individually and on Case No.: 23cv185-GPC(WVG) behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING MOVANT

Plaintiff, COOK’S UNOPPOSED MOTION v. FOR APPOINTMENT AS LEAD

PLAINTIFF AND APPROVAL OF

RYVYL INC. F/K/A GREENBOX POS,

LEAD COUNSEL

BEN ERREZ, FREDI NISAN, J DREW

BYELICK, BENJAMIN CHUNG, EF [Dkt. No. 7.]

HUTTON F/K/A KINGWOOD

CAPITAL MARKETS, A DIVISION OF

BENCHMARK INVESTMENTS, INC. and R.F. LAFFERTY & CO., 19 Defendants.

21 This is a putative securities fraud class action brought on behalf of persons or 22 entities “who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Ryvyl securities: (1) 23 pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus [ ] issued in 24 connection with the Company’s January 29, 2021 public offering [ ]; and/or (2) between 25 January 29, 2021 and January 20, 2023, inclusive [ ].” (Dkt. No. 1, Compl. ¶ 1.) 26 Movant Scot S. Cook (“Movant Cook”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.