Cullen
Cullen v. Ryvyl Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20233:23-cv-00185California1,668 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK CULLEN, individually and on Case No.: 23cv185-GPC(WVG) behalf of all others similarly situated,
ORDER GRANTING MOVANT
Plaintiff, COOK’S UNOPPOSED MOTION v. FOR APPOINTMENT AS LEAD
PLAINTIFF AND APPROVAL OF
RYVYL INC. F/K/A GREENBOX POS,
LEAD COUNSEL
BEN ERREZ, FREDI NISAN, J DREW
BYELICK, BENJAMIN CHUNG, EF [Dkt. No. 7.]
HUTTON F/K/A KINGWOOD
CAPITAL MARKETS, A DIVISION OF
BENCHMARK INVESTMENTS, INC. and R.F. LAFFERTY & CO., 19 Defendants.
21 This is a putative securities fraud class action brought on behalf of persons or 22 entities “who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Ryvyl securities: (1) 23 pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus [ ] issued in 24 connection with the Company’s January 29, 2021 public offering [ ]; and/or (2) between 25 January 29, 2021 and January 20, 2023, inclusive [ ].” (Dkt. No. 1, Compl. ¶ 1.) 26 Movant Scot S. Cook (“Movant Cook”)…