Clinton

Clinton v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20233:23-cv-00119California6,131 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKEITH CLINTON, Case No.: 3:23-cv-0119-DMS-DEB

CDCR #AY1315

ORDER:

13 Plaintiff, (1) GRANTING MOTION TO 14 vs. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

M. POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, S. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

STEADMAN, ASHBURY, CORTEZ, FOR FAILING TO STATE A

NAHN, CRUZ, C. MOORE, DOES 1-10, CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

18 Defendants. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 19 20 21 I. INTRODUCTION Markeith Clinton (“Plaintiff” of “Clinton”), is a state inmate currently incarcerated at R. J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego County and proceeding pro se. He has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s IFP motion but dismisses his Complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend. II. MOTION TO PROCEED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.