Sanchez-Rivera

Sanchez-Rivera v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20233:22-cv-01254California238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN SANCHEZ-RIVERA, Case No.: 22-cv-1254-BAS-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING THIRD MOTION

v. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [ECF 36] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On May 15, 2023, Plaintiff filed a single-page document captioned “Motion for Counsel.” (ECF 36.) Although the document does not contain any text beyond the caption, Plaintiff’s name, and case number, the Court construes the filing as a Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Plaintiff has moved for the appointment of counsel on two previous occasions. (See ECF 5, 20.) The Court denied both motions. (See ECF 10, 26.) As before, Plaintiff has failed to show exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of counsel. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); see also Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Agyeman v. Corrs. Corp. of Am., 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 / / / ||(9th Cir. 2004)). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.