Walther-Meade

Walther-Meade v. Leidos, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20233:22-cv-01777California825 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE WALTHER-MEADE, an Case No.: 3:22-cv-01777-JAH-BLM individual,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, MOTION TO STAY CIVIL ACTION v. 13 (ECF No. 17). LEIDOS, INC., a Delaware corporation; 14 and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 Defendants/Counter Claimant. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff/Counter Defendant George Walther-Meade’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Stay the Civil Action Pending Resolution of Criminal Proceedings. (“Mot.”, ECF No. 17). Defendant/Counter Claimant Leidos, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 20). Upon consideration of the motion and the non-opposition, and for the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. On October 7, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint in San Diego County Superior Court commencing the above-entitled matter. (See Compl., ECF No. 1-4, Ex. A). Plaintiff alleges Defendant wrongfully terminated his employment, divested Plaintiff …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.