Blain

Blain v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20233:22-cv-00970California1,703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARAH BLAIN, individually and on Case No.: 22-cv-00970-AJB-DEB behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

v.

COMPLAINT

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, (Doc. No. 34) 16 Defendant. 17 Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company’s (“Liberty Mutual”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Sarah Blain’s claim for violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 34.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 36), to which Liberty Mutual replied, (Doc. No. 37). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the instant matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the hearing currently set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.