Kelly

Kelly v. Cook

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20233:23-cv-00619California1,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOLORES KELLY, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00619-JAH-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S TIM COOK,

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

Defendant. PAUPERIS;

16 (2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT;

18 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL.

(ECF Nos. 2, 3) INTRODUCTION On April 6, 2023, Dolores Kelly (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging corruption and fraud against Tim Cook (“Defendant”). ECF No. 1. Plaintiff also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), (ECF No. 2), and for appointment of counsel, (ECF No. 3). After a review of the pleadings, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court (1) DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP, (2) DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice, and (3) DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.