Santana

Santana v. Hemmerling

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20233:21-cv-00406California766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA PAUL SANTANA, Case No.: 21-cv-406-JO-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH

v. PREJUDICE JOHN C. HERMMERLING, CAROL MENDOZA, and MARA W. ELLIOTT, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Joshua Paul Santana, proceeding pro se, filed his original complaint on March 8, 2021. Dkt. 1. On January 28, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Dkt. 13. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend because of his pro se status, and Plaintiff timely filed his First Amended Complaint on February 9, 2022. On October 17, 2022, the Court again dismissed his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim and granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint on or before November 15, 2022. Dkt. 20. On November 7, 2022, Plaintiff filed a letter to the Court and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.