The Estate of Paul Silva v. City of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 THE ESTATE OF PAUL SILVA, et al., Case No.: 3:18-cv-2282-L-MSB
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
v. [ECF NO. 242]
17 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 18 Defendants.
20 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure of Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part 22 Defendant City of San Diego’s Summary Judgment Motion. Plaintiffs seek limited 23 reconsideration as to claims based on Defendant Officer Murrow’s conduct including the 24 Bane Act claim, Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Rehabilitation Act (“RA”) 25 claims, and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need claim. (Mot. at 1 [ECF No. 26 242-1.]) 27 // 28 I. BACKGROUND The Court incorporates the statement of facts as contained in the Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant City of San Diego’s Summary Judgment Motion. II. LEGAL…