Brady

Brady v. LendingClub Bank, National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20233:23-cv-00495California1,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BRADY, Case No.: 23-CV-495 TWR (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART JOINT

MOTION TO STAY ACTION AND

LENDINGCLUB BANK, NATIONAL

ARBITRATE ALL CLAIMS AND

ASSOCIATION,

(2) DISMISSING ACTION Defendant. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(ECF No. 7) Presently before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Action and Arbitrate All Claims (the “Joint Motion”). (See ECF No. 7, “Joint Mot.”) After carefully reviewing the relevant law and the Parties’ submission, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Joint Motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Michael Brady initiated this action against Defendant LendingClub Bank, National Association (“LendingClub”) on March 19, 2023. (See ECF No. 1.) The Complaint alleges Defendant violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.