Ramsey

Ramsey v. Corronado

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20233:22-cv-01859California3,784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL RAMSEY, Case No.: 22-cv-1859-MMA (WVG)

CDCR #K99536

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

vs. (2) DISMISSING DUE PROCESS CLAIM FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM UNDER 28 U.S.C.

J. CORRONADO, G. ORTIZ, H. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A; AND MOSELEY, (3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO Defendants. EFFECT SERVICE UPON

DEFENDANTS AS TO PLAINTIFF’S

FIRST AMENDMENT CLAIMS

ONLY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3) 22 23 I. INTRODUCTION Daniel Chris Ramsey (“Plaintiff” of “Ramsey”), a state inmate currently incarcerated at High Desert State Prison and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with an application to proceed in forma 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.