Vicentini

Vicentini v. Tillster, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20233:22-cv-01148California5,855 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 PAOLO VICENTINI, LUIGI Case No.: 22-cv-1148-L-JLB

VICENTINI, ANDREA DELLA VALLE,

MARCO TESINI, DANIELA ORDER:

MAZZOLENI GALBIATI, and

FRANCESCA TESINI, (1) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, DISMISS AND STRIKE [ECF No. 7] v. 9 (2) GRANTING IN PART AND

TILLSTER, INC., PERSE FAILY, PAUL

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO PAPPAJOHN, and DOES 1–10, DISMISS [ECF No. 12] 11 Defendants. (3) DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE [ECF No. 13] 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Perse Faily and Defendant Paul Pappajohn’s motion to dismiss and strike portions of the amended complaint. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiffs Paolo Vicentini, Luigi Vicentini, Andrea Della Valle, Marco Tesini, Daniela Mazzoleni Galbiati, and Francesca Tesini (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) opposed, (ECF No. 11), and Faily and Pappajohn replied, (ECF No. 16). Also pending before the Court are Defendant 19 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.