Vent

Vent v. Fletcher

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20233:22-cv-01651California2,741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTIN VENT, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01651-RBM-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

NATHAN FLETCHER, NORA [Doc. 5]

VARGAS, TERRA LAWSON REMER,

JIM DESMOND, JOEL ANDERSON,

CYNTHIA PAES, MICHAEL VU, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 Currently before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Nathan Fletcher, Nora Vargas, Terra Lawson-Remer, Jim Desmond, Joel Anderson, Cynthia Paes, and Michael Vu (“Defendants”). (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff Kristin Vent (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, filed a response in opposition to the motion to dismiss (Doc. 8), and Defendants filed a reply (Doc. 12). The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.