Valles

Valles v. Attorney General of the United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20233:22-cv-01375California3,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW VALLES, Case No.: 22-CV-1375 TWR (BGS)

CDCR #BJ-6191,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, RECONSIDERATION AND vs. DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION AS

FRIVOLOUS PURSUANT TO

ATTORNEY GENERAL of the UNITED 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) STATES; ATTORNEY GENERAL of the

STATE of CALIFORNIA; and (ECF No. 4) ATTORNEY GENERAL of the STATE 17 of UTAH, Defendants. 19 20 Plaintiff Andrew Valles, currently incarcerated at California Institution for Men (“CIM”) in Chino, California, has been denied the privilege to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this case because three of his prior civil actions or appeals have been dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a claim. (See ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff did not pay the civil filing fee, (see generally Docket), and his Complaint was dismissed without prejudice on November 18, 2022, (see ECF No. 3). On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.