Adams

Adams v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20233:23-cv-00784California1,641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY DESEAN ADAMS, Case No.: 23-cv-00784-DMS-KSC

CDCR #BI-0471,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

AND (2) DISMISSING CIVIL

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY

S. MOORE; N. NIETO; QUIJI FILING FEE REQUIRED BY

16 TOYODA; QUIROZ; A. CARLOS, 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 17 Defendants. (ECF No. 2)

19 Plaintiff Henry Desean Adams, proceeding pro se and incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“CEN”), has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Adam alleges that when he arrived at CEN in November 16, 2022, CEN prison officials failed to correctly calculate his “estimated projected release date (“EPRD”)” and he should have been released from prison in 2021. (Id. at 4.) He seeks injunctive relief “to stop all retaliatory actions, correctly calculate Plaintiff’s EPRD at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.