Crlollos

(PC) Reynolds v. Crlollos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20233:22-cv-01830California1,071 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRONE REYNOLDS, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01830-JAH-BGS

CDCR #2977,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

Plaintiffs, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE vs.

R. CRLOLLOS, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 18 I. Introduction Plaintiff Tyrone Reynolds, while housed at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP) and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Eastern District of California. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Reynolds did not prepay the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), but did file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 2. On November 21, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Sheila Oberto determined that the claims giving rise to this action occurred in San Diego County and transferred the matter to Southern District of California. See ECF No. 3. / / / On December 9, 2022, the Court denied Reynolds’s IFP motion because he had not submitted a “certified copy …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.