Celaya

Celaya v. Cervantes

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20233:23-cv-00089California4,009 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANRNOLD CELAYA, Case No.: 3:23-cv-0089-BTM-NLS

CDCR #AN0122,

Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING vs. COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28

U.S.C. § 1915A AND DISMISSING

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO

CERVANTES, RAMIREZ, J. HILL,

STATE A CLAIM

Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Arnold Celaya (“Celaya” or “Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and paid the civil filing fee. ECF Nos. 1, 3. Ceyala alleges Defendants Cervantes, Ramirez and Hill violated his constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, and the Sixth Amendment. He seeks money damages. See ECF No. 1 at 10. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A courts must conduct “early review—‘before docketing [] or [] as soon as practicable after docketing’—for all complaints ‘in which a prisoner seeks 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.