Celaya
Celaya v. Cervantes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANRNOLD CELAYA, Case No.: 3:23-cv-0089-BTM-NLS
CDCR #AN0122,
Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING vs. COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28
U.S.C. § 1915A AND DISMISSING
COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO
CERVANTES, RAMIREZ, J. HILL,
STATE A CLAIM
Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Arnold Celaya (“Celaya” or “Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and paid the civil filing fee. ECF Nos. 1, 3. Ceyala alleges Defendants Cervantes, Ramirez and Hill violated his constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, and the Sixth Amendment. He seeks money damages. See ECF No. 1 at 10. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A courts must conduct “early review—‘before docketing [] or [] as soon as practicable after docketing’—for all complaints ‘in which a prisoner seeks 27 …