Holmes
Holmes v. Estock
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHARLES HOLMES, Case No.: 16-cv-2458-MMA (BLM)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
vs. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE A DAUBERT MOTION
ESTOCK, et al.,
Defendants. [Doc. No. 187] 15 16 Plaintiff Charles Holmes, a California inmate, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. On June 16, 2022, the Court appointed Plaintiff Pro Bono Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) and General Order 596. See Doc. No. 169. Plaintiff now moves the Court for leave to file a motion challenging Defendants’ experts pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 582 (1993). Pursuant to the Rule 16 Scheduling Order and the undersigned’s Civil Chambers Rules, Daubert motions were due no later than October 4, 2019. See Doc. No. 93; Civ. Chambers R. IX fn. 3. Although Plaintiff seeks to file a…