Walker
Walker v. Stryker Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE WALKER, Case No. 22-cv-264-MMA (DDL)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP., et
JUDGMENT
al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 59] 16 17 18 Plaintiff Kyle Walker (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Defendants Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (“Howmedica”) and Stryker Employment Company, LLC (“Stryker” and collectively with Howmedica, “Defendants”) asserting claims for unpaid wages and related penalties. See Doc. No. 23 (“First Amended Compl.” or “FAC”). Defendants move for summary judgment in its entirety, or in the alternative, for partial summary judgment. See Doc. No. 59. Plaintiff filed an opposition, to which Defendants replied. See Doc. Nos. 62, 65. The Court found this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 64. For the reasons set forth below, the…