Krystal
Krystal v. City of Carlsbad
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALAN MICHAEL KRYSTAL, Case No. 22-cv-1329-BAS-JLB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. 1. GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF CITY OF CARLSBAD, et al., Nos. 13, 14); AND 14 Defendants. 2. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND (ECF No. 19)
17
Before the Court are Defendants’ two Motions to Dismiss brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6).1 (Mot., ECF No. 13; ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff opposes (Opp., ECF No. 16), and Defendants reply (Reply, ECF No. 18). The Court finds Defendants’ Motions suitable for determination on the papers submitted without oral argument. CivLR 7.1(d)(i). Having considered the parties’ filings, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motions. 25 26
28 Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend. (ECF No. 19.) Defendants do not file opposition briefing. Having considered Plaintiff’s filing, the Court 2…