Kirkpatrick

Kirkpatrick v. San Diego Police

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20233:23-cv-00762California3,066 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHLYNN KIRKPATRICK, Case No.: 23-cv-762-GPC-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

SAN DIEGO POLICE,

PAUPERIS;

Defendant. [ECF No. 2] (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM; (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL [ECF No. 3]

20 Plaintiff Shlynn Kirkpatrick, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against 21 Defendant San Diego Police. ECF No. 1. Kirkpatrick also filed an application to 22 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2, and a request for appointment of counsel, 23 ECF No. 3. Based on the reasoning below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to 24 proceed in forma pauperis; DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, and 25 sua sponte DISMISSES the action for failure to state a claim. The Court GRANTS 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.