Kirkpatrick
Kirkpatrick v. San Diego Police
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20233:23-cv-00762California3,066 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHLYNN KIRKPATRICK, Case No.: 23-cv-762-GPC-KSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
SAN DIEGO POLICE,
PAUPERIS;
Defendant. [ECF No. 2] (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM; (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL [ECF No. 3]
20 Plaintiff Shlynn Kirkpatrick, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against 21 Defendant San Diego Police. ECF No. 1. Kirkpatrick also filed an application to 22 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2, and a request for appointment of counsel, 23 ECF No. 3. Based on the reasoning below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to 24 proceed in forma pauperis; DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, and 25 sua sponte DISMISSES the action for failure to state a claim. The Court GRANTS 26…