Torres

Torres v. Paredes

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20233:22-cv-00448California4,165 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUCEBIO TORRES, Case No.: 22-cv-448-JES-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

OFFICER G. PAREDES, et al.,

Defendants. ECF No. 17 16 Defendants C. Valencia; S. Moore; R. Madden; Y. Castillo; G. Paredes; and T. 17 Carranza filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on 18 various grounds, including failure to state a claim as to Defendant C. Valencia in the first 19 cause of action; failure to state a claim for supervisory liability as to all Defendants in the 20 second cause of action; and failure to state a claim as to Defendants G. Paredes and C. 21 Valencia in the fourth cause of action. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS 22 IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS

24 Plaintiff was an inmate at Centinela State Prison (“CDCR-CEN”). In 2020, inmates 25 who were once segregated at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.