Eller

Eller v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20233:23-cv-00943California5,797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 AMY ELLER, Case No. 23-cv-0943-BAS-AHG 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

INC., ORDER

12 Defendant. 13 14 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order. (TRO App., ECF No. 3.) Defendant opposes. (Opp., ECF No. 9.) The Court held oral argument on June 2, 2023. (ECF No. 17.) Having considered the parties’ filings and oral argument, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order. (ECF No. 3.) I. BACKGROUND Defendant Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (“Defendant” or “ADP”) employed Plaintiff Amy Eller (“Plaintiff”) from approximately November 2018 until January 2023, when it terminated her. (Compl. ¶ 13.) Plaintiff was employed as a sales representative, and her job duties included calling existing and prospective small business customers to sell ADP services and products. (Id.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.